|
CAMPAIGN
FOR CONTRACT AGRICULTURE REFORM
a voice for contract farmers, ranchers and their communities
Why Amending the Packers and Stockyards Act is Important
1) Packers and Stockyards
protection would be extended to all poultry farmers, not just those who
raise the broilers.
The definition of a “poultry grower” in the present Packers
and Stockyards Act (P&S Act) is “any person engaged in the business
of raising and caring for live poultry for slaughter by another... .”
This definition has been interpreted by the courts to mean that the P&S
Act applies only to the broiler growers because the birds they care for
go directly to a processing plant. The Act has been interpreted as not
applying to breeder hen or pullet growers. *
The proposed poultry act will amend the P&S Act by deleting references
to “slaughter,” so that pullet and breeder hen growers are
also covered. The amended definition accurately reflects the integrated
nature of the modern poultry industry where the total supply line for
a processing plant - including pullet, breeder, and broiler farms - is
tightly controlled by one company.
* Poultry production has several stages. Before a group of breeder hens
are of laying age, they are raised on a pullet farm. After the pullets
reach laying age, they are moved to a breeder farm where the hens produce
eggs that are collected and trucked to the hatchery. Once the eggs hatch,
the chicks are delivered to a broiler farm where they are raised until
ready for processing.
2) USDA would be granted administrative authority to stop unfair
practices in the poultry industry that matches its authority in the beef
and pork industries.
The present Packers and Stockyards Act makes it unlawful for a livestock
packer or live poultry dealer “to engage in or use any unfair, unjustly
discriminatory or deceptive practice or device, or to give any unreasonable
advantage to any particular person or locality.” However, USDA’s
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) has no
general authority to stop the unfair practices nor penalize the poultry
dealers. As former GIPSA Administrator Jim Baker commented during his
tenure, “We have the responsibility but not the authority.”
When violations of the Act are discovered in the livestock industry, GIPSA
has the authority to take administrative actions, including holding hearings
and assessing civil and criminal penalties. However, GIPSA does not have
this administrative enforcement authority in the poultry industry.
When violations of the Act are discovered in the poultry industry, GIPSA
can only issue an order to cease illegal conduct. In extreme cases, GIPSA
can send the complaint to the Justice Department. >From the poultry
company’s perspective, breaking the law and increasing company profits
through fraudulent or deceptive practices carries little financial or
legal risk.
The proposed poultry act will give all contract poultry growers the same
legal protection under the Packers and Stockyards Act as other livestock
producers. The proposed poultry act will help end the unfair practices
in the poultry industry.
For more information, contact
Steve Etka at 703-354-3303 Camp |